OptimalIntegrity Studio™ Wiki / Value and deployment
Value and config
Value and deployment
What a risk-based integrity programme returns, what data it needs, and how it is configured to deliver, in general terms.
Potential value
Across Optimal client engagements, structured risk-based inspection and integrity management return value in these ranges, shown for context, not as a guarantee:
The safety and environmental gain is the point: inspection is concentrated on the items that carry the loss-of-containment risk, so the serious failures are prevented. Cost falls as low-risk items earn longer intervals, and availability rises as unplanned integrity failures and their shutdowns are avoided.
What it takes: the inputs
| Equipment and P&IDs | The vessels, piping, tanks and relief devices, with corrosion circuits and the drawings that define them. |
|---|---|
| Materials and process conditions | Metallurgy, fluids, temperatures and pressures: what the damage-mechanism screening runs on. |
| Inspection and thickness history | Past findings and thickness readings, to set corrosion rates and inspection effectiveness. |
| Consequence data | Inventories, fluids and their hazard, plus production and repair cost, to model consequence of failure. |
| Risk target | The acceptable risk line, from the operator risk criteria, that the plan is worked against. |
Config to deliver value (general)
In general terms, the programme earns out when: the equipment register and corrosion circuits are clean and complete; the damage-mechanism screening is reviewed by a corrosion engineer, not accepted blind; the consequence data is honest, so the risk ranking is real; the risk target is agreed up front; and the assessment is kept evergreen, reassessed after each inspection and on any process change, rather than done once and shelved. Sensitivity analysis covers the gaps where data is thin so a programme can start before every number is perfect.
A typical path
Build the register and corrosion circuits; screen the damage mechanisms; run the RBI assessment and rank the estate against the risk target; issue the inspection plan with intervals, coverage and technique; feed findings and thickness back so risk and remaining life update; run fitness-for-service on any damage found; and publish the integrity-risk indicator to the ARaaS® Dashboard on a set review cadence.
Where do you stand?
Before you invest, the GARPI™ benchmark shows your asset-management maturity against industry peers: an independent, ISO 55001 and GFMAM-aligned score from 0 to 100 across eight weighted dimensions and five maturity tiers, free and anonymous. It is a fast way to see where you are today, and where OptimalIntegrity Studio™ moves you first. Take the GARPI™ benchmark.